Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology
Time:
Tuesday, 24/Sept/2024:
8:30am - 10:00am

Session Chair: Torsten Graupner, BGR Hannover
Session Chair: Simon Hector, KIT
Session Chair: Jasemin Ayse Ölmez, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Session Chair: Max Frenzel, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Location: Saal St. Petersburg

90 PAX
Session Topics:
03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
8:45am - 9:00am
ID: 342 / LeS 2 - 03.a: 2
Topics: 03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

Assessing the Efficiency of Phytogeochemical Mineral Exploration

Lucija Dujmović1, Solveig Pospiech2, Jörg Matschullat3

1Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology; 2Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Resource Ecology; 3TU Bergakademie Freiberg

Vegetation cover poses a significant challenge in geological surveys. Utilizing plant chemistry to detect underlying geological features offers a non-invasive exploration tool. Here, we employ a novel approach in biogeochemical data analysis to distinguish between mineral deposits and bedrock void of mineralization. Different plant species and tissues exhibit distinct element compositions in a multivariate hyperspace, making direct comparisons in terms of absolute concentrations challenging. Our approach aims to overcome this traditional constraint by analyzing biogeochemical datasets irrespective of the specific species and tissue collected, as we will account for the physiological variations through data preprocessing. We use principles of compositional data analysis to transform biogeochemical datasets, enabling comparability across different sample materials and other plant datasets.

The corrected biogeochemical dataset for the sample type was analyzed using Linear Discriminant Analysis to identify element associations indicative of differences between samples collected over mineralized bedrock and those from rocks void of mineralization (barren). Results show differences in group means between samples sourced from pillow basalts and mafic rocks compared to their mineralized counterparts, distinguishing between mineralized and mineralization-free samples. For example, when comparing element ratios of Cu, Ca, and Rb to P and Sr, differentiation is observed across six distinct plant materials between barren pillow lavas and the corresponding mineralized bedrock.



9:00am - 9:15am
ID: 296 / LeS 2 - 03.a: 3
Topics: 03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

Does different metal endowment in orogenic Au deposits (Pohjanmaa Belt, western Finland) form during different tectonic events?

Andressa de Araujo Silva1,2, Simon Hector1,2, Clifford Patten1,2,3, Aratz Beranoaguirre1,2,4, Elisabeth Eiche1,2, Benjamin F. Walter1,2,5, Jochen Kolb1,2

1Institute of Applied Geosciences (AGW), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany; 2Laboratory for Environmental and Raw Materials Analysis (LERA), AGW, KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany; 3Institute of -Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Innsbruck, Austria; 4Institute of Geosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; 5Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Department of Petrology and Mineral Resources, Germany

The Pohjanmaa Belt in western Finland hosts orogenic Au deposits with enrichment in base metals, such as the Jouhineva Cu-Co-Au-Ag deposit (0.448 Mt at 0.811% Cu, 0.182% Co, 0.88 ppm Au, and 7.864 ppm Ag measured reserves). It is located 3 km NW of the Au-only Huhta occurrence along the same NNW-trending fault. We test if the different metal association in both deposits is related to temporally and structurally different mineralization events. Four deformation events are distinguished: D1 formed a now EW- and NW-trending S1, which is transposed during subsequent deformation; D2 folded S1 into a NW-SE to NNW-SSE trending S2 crenulation cleavage; D3 refolded S2 into close to isoclinal folds and generated a NNW-SSE trending, axial planar S3; D4 formed a centimeter-spaced, EW-trending S4 foliation. Huhta hosts syn-D3 Lö-Apy-Au-Qtz veins with multiple stages of sulfide, arsenide, and sulfarsenide mineralization. Jouhineva hosts syn-D3 Apy-Au-Ccp-Qtz and syn-D4 Ccp-Au-Qtz veins. Titanite U-Pb and structural data indicate synchronous formation of Lö-Apy-Au-Qtz veins in Huhta and Apy-Au-Ccp-Qtz veins in Jouhineva at 1850-1820 Ma during D3. Thus, the different mineralogy and metal endowments formed during the same tectonic event during the Svecofennian Orogeny. Only Jouhineva hosts additional Cu-Au mineralization that formed later during the retrograde evolution. The different metal association in both occurrences may be explained by different metal and fluid sources and compartmentalized fluid migration, distinct mineralization events during the 30 m.y. evolution that cannot be resolved by titanite geochronology, or different precipitation mechanisms although host rocks and PT conditions are similar.



9:15am - 9:30am
ID: 326 / LeS 2 - 03.a: 4
Topics: 03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

Understanding the genesis of Zn-Pb-Ag mineralization in the Gorno MVT District (Northern Italy)

Michele Giorno1, Carlo Bertok2, Luca Barale3, Luca Summino2, Mathias Burisch4, Stefano M. Bernasconi5, Jörg Rickli5, Marcus Oelze6, Joachim Krause1, Max Frenzel1, Luca Martire2

1Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Freiberg, Germany; 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Torino, Italy; 3Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources, Turin, Italy; 4Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA; 5Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zürich, Switzerland; 6GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

The Gorno mining district is an example of Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) deposits in the Italian Orobic Alps. Spanning an area of ~100 km2, it consists of stratabound Zn-Pb-Ag (± fluorite ± barite) mineralization hosted in a lower Carnian stratigraphic succession. Despite Vedra Metals S.r.l.´s acquisition of the exploration license for the deposits has reignited an economic interest, an updated metallogenic model has yet to be developed.

In the carbonate host rocks at Gorno, a complex series of dolomitization, silicification, brecciation, dissolution, and cementation occurred. Microthermometry of primary fluid inclusions in sphalerite and fluorite, alongside sphalerite trace-element geothermometry, indicates formation temperatures ranging from 80 to 140 °C (mean value: ~100 °C). Moreover, fluid inclusion microthermometry and micro-Raman spectroscopy document the involvement of high-salinity brines (up to ~25 eq.wt% NaCl) and gaseous hydrocarbons (e.g. CH4) in ore deposition. Isotopic signatures from ore-related carbonates for carbon (0.5 to 2.5 ‰ PDB), oxygen (-6.6 to -12.1 ‰ PDB), and strontium (0.70840-0.70943) indicate that the ore fluid was likely seawater modified through interaction with the underlying Permian clastic sediments and/or with the metamorphic basement.

The presence of sulfide bodies in association with organic-rich shales implies a notable role of organic carbon in ore deposition. Organic matter and associated hydrocarbons likely served as reactive barriers, leading to the reduction of the ore fluid and initiating the precipitation of sulfide minerals.



9:30am - 9:45am
ID: 303 / LeS 2 - 03.a: 5
Topics: 03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

Transfer of sulfur and chalcophile metals via sulfide-volatile compound drops in the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field

Clifford Patten1, Simon Hector2, Stephanos Kilias3, Marc Ulrich4, Alexandre Peillod2, Aratz Beranoaguirre2, Paraskevi Nomikou3, Elisabeth Eiche2,5, Jochen Kolb2

1Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Innsbruck, Austria; 2Chair for Geochemistry and Economic Geology, Institute of Applied Geosciences (AGW), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany; 3Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; 4Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, France; 5Laboratory of Environment and Raw materials Analysis (LERA), AGW, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany

Efficient transfer of S and chalcophile metals through the Earth’s crust in arc systems is paramount for the formation of large magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits and can strongly affect the Earth’s climate. The formation of sulfide-volatile compound drops has been recognized as a potential key mechanism for such transfer but their fate during dynamic arc magmatism remains cryptic. We report evidence of compound drops preserved in the active Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field. The observed compound drops are micrometric sulfide blebs associated with vesicles trapped within silicate phenocrysts. The compound drops accumulate and coalesce at mafic-felsic melt interfaces where larger sulfide ovoids form. These ovoids are subsequently oxidized to magnetite during sulfide-volatile interaction. Comparison of metal concentrations between the sulfide phases and magnetite allows for determination of element mobility during oxidation. The formation and evolution of compound drops is an efficient mechanism for transferring S and chalcophile metals into shallow magmatic-hydrothermal arc systems.



9:45am - 10:00am
ID: 198 / LeS 2 - 03.a: 6
Topics: 03.a) Mineral Exploration, Economic and Ore Deposit Geology

LREE rich perovskite in antiskarn reactions - REE transfer from pyroxenites to carbonatites?

Daria Voropaeva1, Marion Tichomirowa1, Andrei Arzamastsev2, Roman Botcharnikov3, Stephan Buhre3, Sabine Gilbricht1, Jens Götze1, Reiner Klemd4, Bernhard Schulz1

1Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany; 2Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia; 3Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at Mainz, Germany; 4Universit¨at Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

There is still no consensus in the literature concerning the most critical processes for rare earth elements (REE) enrichment in carbonatite rocks. One-third of alkaline‑carbonatite complexes are associated with ultrabasic and basic rocks. Some basic rocks contain similarly high concentrations of LREE as carbonatites where perovskite [CaTiO3] is responsible for this enrichment. Carbonatites form later than ultrabasic and basic rocks, and carbonate melt penetrates into silicate rocks and reacts with them. The reaction was named “antiskarn reaction”. Until now there is no detailed study on whether perovskite from pyroxenites can become a source for REE enrichment of carbonatite melt during antiskarn reactions.

We studied three ultrabasic-alkaline carbonatite complexes from the Kola Alkaline Province (Russia) to focus on the comparison of REE contents from pyroxenites and carbonatites and the fate of perovskite. Ultrabasic/basic rocks and carbonatites show the same broad range of REE contents. In most analyzed pyroxenites, perovskite is the main REE carrier mineral. For carbonatites/phoscorites, apatite and calcite are the minerals that control rocks' REE enrichment. Several samples show considerable variations of REE concentrations related to carbonatite infiltration, sometimes even at a very low local scale (mm2). If perovskite was present it was replaced near the carbonatite melt by titanite that has much lower REE contents. Calcites and apatites from the infiltrated carbonatite are highly enriched in LREE but show large local element variations. Thus, we propose that LREE liberated by the perovskite replacement can be dissolved in the carbonatite melt and transferred to its crystallizing minerals (calcite, apatite).